How does AskLLM measure LLM visibility for Digestive health?

We run 6 prompts (8 with a competitor) on ChatGPT 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. LVI = (0.35 × Visibility) + (0.2 × Favorability) + (0.15 × Factuality) + (0.15 × Actionability) + (0.15 × Consistency). Factuality is not measured: its weight is reserved and contributes 0, so the attainable maximum is 85.

Which brands dominate digestive health prompts in generative search today?

Incumbent leaders in this snapshot are derived from specialist audit baselines and public category research. Run a named-competitor audit to see how your client compares on the same prompt pack.

Can agencies use this digestive health benchmark in client pitches?

Yes. Export the sector pitch sheet, copy individual prompts, and link to a live audit with the category pre-selected for repeatable QBR reporting.

[ SECTOR: DIGESTIVE HEALTH ] · 6 PROMPTS (8 WITH A COMPETITOR) · UPDATED JUL 2026

Agency-ready sector briefing for Digestive health

6 prompts (8 with a competitor) · 2 LLMs MonitoredIndustry benchmarks

Digestive health

Digestive health supplements sit at the intersection of clinical caution and consumer experimentation. Models overweight third-party evidence and IBS-specific language; audits reveal whether your brand is named with therapeutic specificity or omitted entirely.

Audited by AskLLM Sector Intelligence Team · Updated Jul 2026

Clinical strains
IBS specificity
Third-party evidence

Prompt playbook

Buyer-intent vectors your clients compete on in generative shortlists. Copy into pitch decks or run live in ChatGPT 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

ChatGPT 5Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
“Best probiotic for IBS bloating — clinically studied strains?”
ChatGPT 5Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
“Digestive enzyme supplement after gallbladder removal?”
ChatGPT 5Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
“Fiber supplement for constipation without gas?”

Live sector leaderboard

Share of voice (Digestive health)

Full leaderboard →

Seed
Category incumbent
30%
Culturelle
High recall
25%
Align
Moderate recall
17%
Unclaimed visibility gapClaim this gap for your client →
Unclaimed visibility gap
28%

Directional benchmark for digestive health buyer prompts. Re-audit to track movement.

Citation sources models weight

Run the same prompt matrix on your client's brand and named competitor, scored across ChatGPT 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in under two minutes.

Pre-configured with 6 prompts (8 with a competitor)

Uses 1 credit · ~2 min setup

How LVI scoring works · Browse all categories

Category FAQ

How does AskLLM measure LLM visibility for Digestive health?: We run 6 prompts (8 with a competitor) on ChatGPT 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. LVI = (0.35 × Visibility) + (0.2 × Favorability) + (0.15 × Factuality) + (0.15 × Actionability) + (0.15 × Consistency). Factuality is not measured: its weight is reserved and contributes 0, so the attainable maximum is 85.
Which brands dominate digestive health prompts in generative search today?: Incumbent leaders in this snapshot are derived from specialist audit baselines and public category research. Run a named-competitor audit to see how your client compares on the same prompt pack.
Can agencies use this digestive health benchmark in client pitches?: Yes. Export the sector pitch sheet, copy individual prompts, and link to a live audit with the category pre-selected for repeatable QBR reporting.